I can’t say that I completely agree with the author, but this at least shows that RSS is gaining in popularity. I think he expects a bit too much at this point from RSS. It does exactly what I want it to do. While I’m open to seeing other possibilities, I think some of his ideas are a bit far-fetched. Example:
Today’s RSS readers are dumb; they simply pull the content I’ve told it to pull.
Tomorrow’s will have to do better. Rather than offer me articles and blog entries based on sites I’ve selected, a version 2.0 RSS reader will serve up stories based on my interests.
It will have to take the source into account, but unlike today’s RSS the source won’t be the be-all and end-all of deciding a feed’s worthiness.
For example, I’ll tell my reader I’m interested in stories about solar energy.
It will then serve me solar-related content each day using the entire Internet as a library. It will learn the stories I prefer as I rate each one on a scale from 1 to 10, probably by using a Bayesian algorithm.
Eventually, my 2.0 reader will have compiled a list of trusted and preferred resources for each topic I’m interested in. It will create for me a custom news page that displays the latest about every topic I’ve told it to, not simply every site I like.
I think he’s talking about a different application, which is not a bad thing. It seems like he wants a feature like TiVo has where it suggests other programs you might want to record based on what you’ve already recorded. I had a TiVo and I hated that feature because I hated all the suggested shows. I just wanted it to record exactly what I wanted it to record, and nothing more. Maybe a better algorithm would have helped.
Anyway, I highly recommend the article.
Link to complete article